Monday, April 19, 2010

I'm Not Paranoid, but...

...Reading about panopticism has made me weary.

Michel Foucault's writing on the theory/idea of "Panopticism" is one that can make even the most trusting individual a little uneasy. Throughout life, one is put into boxes. Literally, and figuratively. For example, as Foucault mentions, a panoptican is a structure that is a singular building meant for the observation of prisoners. The prisoner can essentially be replaced with a variety of options - students, employees, patients and even animals.
Growing up with California Standardized Testing, it was routine for the cardboard desk separators to come out to box each student in to their "testing cubby." This was to ensure that no cheating and absolutely NO socializing was to take place. The instructor/teacher could monitor the classroom easily without the children being able to see anything but the flimsy test booklet and scantron form in front of them.

Foucault uses Bentham's Panopticon as a means to regulate discipline in everyday society. As he says, it is used to ensure an "apparatus of power." The observer rules/maintains through the weakness of the observed. In the prison example, the panopticon is concrete cells in a circular formation allowing no contact between the incarcerated. The center of the circle is "flooded with light" so the prisoner cannot see outward, but the guard in the tower can see each person individually. The person in turn becomes an "object of information, never a subject in communication."
School as an institution is oppressive. Going to a university or college (while burdensome in it's own way) is not the same, however. From kindergarten until completion of high school, the "well"-oiled machine chugs away; sit in your desk, listen to us talk, go on two small breaks under authoritative (prison guard) eye, homework (yard labor), sleep and start all over again. Once you're up for parole, the real world sends you back for more internment ("higher education.")
Effectiveness comes through individualization, yet in today's society the only individual attention the student gets is when he/she is being scolded by a teacher/aide/principal/parent. For the cynic, the panoptic representation of a prison has a seamless transition to primary-high school.

Wednesday, April 14, 2010

Back on the Wagon

Ok, ok, I know it's been way too long since I've written a real post. I never blatantly ignore assignments (it's not my style, as my inherent guilt and stress kick in immediately.) Let's just say I'm playing the "poor me" card for many reasons - lots of school, lots of work, lots of anticipation for Summer. This is a tough semester, and I really do think that I have pre-assignment/essay/test anxiety. Once I get the ball rolling, I seem to be ok. Some may call this laziness. Who knows.
Because I'm already complaining, let's get this out of the way - someone in our class (who shall remain nameless) is out of their mind. No one needs to read about your sexual exploits/wannabe rhymes. What does that shiz have to do with class??? Oh, wait. I know. Maybe if said person showed up to class, there'd be some sembelance of correlation between blog posts and class sessions.

Speaking of class - I can appreciate a good, cerebral, dense plot (movies, film, tv, bla bla bla.) Chekhov's "Three Sisters," however, was not my cup of tea. At all. If someone asked me what we watched on Monday, I wouldn't be able to answer outside of, "old timey Brits in Russia with a creepy dad and off-duty military men attempting to have a meal of some kind."

I'm hoping "Hannah and Her Sisters" is better... Allen is strange and has a quirky sense of humor, so I'm banking on an off-color representation of Chehov's Borefest 2010.

I feel uninspired just thinking about it. Sorry, Professor Wexler.

Monday, April 12, 2010

Midterm Essay

Horny Little Boys are Funny, Horny Old Men are Creepy

From the beginning of time, sex has simultaneously served the purpose of perpetuating the human race and creating an arena for pleasure and obsession. Every culture has a different view on what is deemed “normal” – some countries (like Amsterdam, Netherlands) are more liberal in what is seen as obscene and have commercial areas where sex shows, escorts and other related tangible elements can be sought. Other countries like Afghanistan and Iran restrict sexual relations for the sole purpose of procreation and as a means to control and perpertuate gender barriers. In the United States today, the commercial value of the entertainment industry is held in high esteem. The economy is boosted when a big box office hit commands the attention (and wallets) of audiences who happily shell out upward of $10 a ticket.
Generally speaking, it is safe to say that sex plays a major role in movies, music, books and other artistic outlets. This is not a new development, as sexual scandal sold the story of the Greek Tragedy Oedipus Rex, deemed Philip Roth’s Portnoy’s Complaint one of the most controversial and banned texts, continually existed in the subconscious background actor/director Woody Allen’s movies and writings, and in the works of Chuck Palahniuk – master of the modern day perverse. Looking at all of these works, however, it is striking to notice the way the characters are portrayed. To be more specific, it is notable how age plays a factor in how the male brain is presented to an audience. In movies and literature today, young, sexually minded males are portrayed as humorous, while adult sexually minded males are seen as perverse or psychologically disturbed.
Psychologist Sigmund Freud first suggested the Oedipus Complex in the early 20th century. This psychological term/condition explains the alleged unconscious (and usually repressed) sexual feelings and desires that a male feels for his birth mother. This “complex” is presented as a phase of life where the young male feels not only unexplained desire for his mother, but also a sense of protectiveness. In class it was suggested that the physical bond formed in nine months of pregnancy alone is enough to create an inherent connection toward one’s mother. The male child is groomed to compulsion toward his mother from the time of conception to the time of breastfeeding, where he can freely gaze into her eyes. Just as a grown man would become protective of his girlfriend or wife, the young male feels a built-in need to protect and love his mother as if it is his duty and responsibility. As the child grows older, this mindset wears off but still exists in the subconscious.
Although the Oedipus Complex supposedly wears off when the male child enters adolescence, traces of the condition rear its head in all of the aforementioned texts. While Woody Allen’s works are entirely more cerebral and self-serving than most at the box office, bookstore or newsstand today, modern audiences are still presented with the idea of the sex-consumed male. Age is a master manipulator of the psyche and emotions. As the entertainment and culture industry thrives, we submerge ourselves into the escapist worlds of the characters created for the big screen and in the pages of novels. While women definitely exhibit more and more sexual freedom, for the purpose of this argument, males are dominantly portrayed and sexual minded creatures. The difference is, though, that grown men are often seen as sexually confused, plagued and consumed with the act resulting in being viewed as deviants, while teenage boys are seen as hormonal, normal and funny in their quest to get laid.
The semester began with the examination of Philip Roth’s Portnoy’s Complaint. Originally published in 1969, Portnoy’s Complaint was received as a scandalous, horrific depiction of a sexually obsessed young adult man. The audience engages with the main character, Alexander Portnoy on a most personal level. Portnoy is young, Jewish, neurotic yet self-loving (in more ways than one) and spilling his guts the entire length of the text to his therapist, Dr. Spielvogel. Alex’s “mommy issues” shine through very clear, paving the way for reflection of how people are portrayed in arts and entertainment.
Throughout the novel, Alex spends most of his time telling anecdotes of his childhood. While his father was a hard-working insurance salesman who was delegated to the poorest, hardest neighborhoods, Alex never fully respected him or gave him the credits he deserved. His feelings toward his mother, however, are the complete opposite. Alex talks about his mother in a way that makes her seem superhuman. For example, the reader is treated to an inside account of how he feels about both of his parents right off the bat –
“It was my mother who could accomplish anything, who herself had to admit that it might even be that she was actually too good… she could make jello, for instance, with sliced peaches hanging in it, peaches just suspended there, in defiance of the law of gravity” (Roth 11).
Alex loves his mother with such an inherent passion that he depicts her nothing short of holy. His father, however, is largely hated/ignored:
“Indeed, during that extended period of rage that goes by the name of my adolescence, what terrified me most about my father was not the violence I wished every nightt at the dinner table to commit upon his ignorant barbaric carcass” (Roth 41).
Both of these quotes work together to illustrate the point that the male brain is psychologically wired to feel passionate toward his mother and resentful of his father. Portnoy’s Complaint does not lack in sexual deviancy, as mentioned above. The beginning of the book largely focuses on Alex as a young boy, coming into his sexual-own. Anecdotes are seriously descriptive, but not disturbing. When he starts to tell Dr. Spievogel about his exploits as a young man, however, reactions go from slightly humorous and juvenile to feels of disgust or exploitation. Just as talked about above, the young male is viewed as explorative and amusing, and the adult male is viewed as a deviant. This does not just take place in literature though, as shown in many current films.
Judd Apatow is undoubtedly one of the most successful director/producers on the planet right now. His works include Undeclared and Freaks and Geeks, both TV sitcoms exploring the emotionally and sexually frustrating lives of high school students. Apatow is more recently praised for his feature films, including Knocked Up, Superbad and Forgetting Sarah Marshall. His works are prime examples of the idea of sex as mechanism of young, male life. For example, the 2007 box-office hit Superbad follows two best friends, Seth and Evan. As graduating seniors, the boys embark on a mission to somehow score booze with their socially inept friend’s fake ID. The quest for alcohol does not exist in the hopes of a night of inebriation, but instead to garner the respect of Jules – Seth’s crush. Jules’ house is the ultimate destination – where the boys know they have sex as a reward for “bringing the party.” Shenanigans ensue throughout the film, all revolving around sexually charged jokes and references. The audience response was more than positive and is now considered to be a “classic.” In all honesty, if Apatow had asked the writers of Superbad to tweak their premise, possibly making Seth and Evan 35 year old men instead of 17 year old boys, it is highly likely that the audience response would find the flick to be less appealing. Why is that? For one reason – although almost everyone thinks about, wants and has sex, being a hormonal teenage boy hell-bent on getting some action while encountering unsavory characters and trying escape a drunken fist fight is much more acceptable than witnessing a 40+ year old man battle his “sex demons” such as in Choke – a novel by Chuck Palahniuk.
Youth has been stamped as a period of your existence where mistakes can be made and all dumb mistakes made are looked back on with endearment. It’s perfectly acceptable to be a pizza delivery driver at 17 years old, but not necessarily the most coveted position as an adult. When the plot of Choke unfolds, the scene is set for the main character named Victor Mancini. Mancini is a former medical student who now works as a colonial re-enactment park, which is presented as a cause for pity alone. He frequents sex addict meetings not to better his “addiction” but to take advantage of the women he meets. As a child, his mother provoked the law causing her custody to be turned over to the state. As Victor bounced from foster home to foster home, he found ways to be back with his mother who would announce her presence in places like drugstores (over the intercom, using a specially assigned code name.) Now approaching his thirties, Victor lives a menial existence of working a dead end job, having sex with anything that won’t walk away from him and tends to his mother – who is in a nursing home for the mentally unstable. Freud would suggest that the motivation for Palahniuk’s “Victor Mancini” comes from a place rooted in the Oedipus Complex. As a child, Victor adored his mother, only to have her ripped away. He rebelled as a youth and grown up, focusing his emotional distress into abundant sexual fetishism and “addiction” as a coping mechanism to fulfill his childhood desire of inherent sexual attraction to his mother. When Victor attends sex addiction meetings, the scene is warped into a dark place of abnormality. Who’s to say that a thirty-something doesn’t want sex (if not more than) a hormonal 17 year old?
When examining movies and literature from both past and present, it is important to recognize the driving force behind what sells. The idea that “sex sells” is a common one, but the elements of this aren’t widely discussed. While young males looking for a good time are viewed as comedic and adult males are viewed as pathetic, it can all be traced back to the idea of the Oedipus Complex. Freud proposed that the male brain is inherently and sexually tied to his mother – while it wears off, the compulsion toward sex is ever-present. It’s now up to the audience to decide how to view it.








WORKS CITED
Superbad (Unrated Widescreen Edition). Dir. Judd Apatow. Perf. Michael Cera, Jonah Hill. Sony Pictures, 2007. DVD.
Freud, Sigmund. Jokes and Their Relation to the Unconscious. New York: W.W Norton & Company, 1989.
Palahniuk, Chuck. Choke. New York: Doubleday, 2001.
Roth, Philip. Portnoy's Complaint. New York: Vintage International, 1994.

Tuesday, March 23, 2010

SUPER ROUGH - Work in Progress

From the beginning of time, sex has simultaneously served the purpose of perpetuating the human race and creating an arena for pleasure and obsession. Every culture has a different view on what is deemed “normal” – some countries (like Amsterdam, Netherlands) are more liberal in what is seen as obscene and have commercial areas where sex shows, escorts and other related tangible elements can be sought; while others like Afghanistan and Iran restrict sexual relations for the sole purpose of procreation and as a means to control and persist gender barriers. In the United States today, the commercial value of the entertainment industry is held in high esteem. The economy is boosted when a big box office hit commands the attention (and wallets) of audiences who happily shell out upwards of $10 a ticket. Generally speaking, it is safe to say that sex plays a major role in movies, music, books and other artistic outlets. This is not a new development, as sexual scandal sold the story of the Greek Tragedy Oedipus Rex, deemed Philip Roth’s Portnoy’s Complaint one of the most controversial and banned texts, continually existed in the subconscious background actor/director Woody Allen’s movies and writings, and in the works of Chuck Palahniuk – master of the modern day perverse. Looking at all of these works, however, it is striking to notice the way the characters are portrayed. To be more specific, it is notable how age plays a factor in how the male brain is presented to an audience. According to Sigmund Freud, every male develops an Oedipus Complex. From the time of conception and nine months of being physically connected until birth when the baby looks into his mother’s eyes while breastfeeding, a sense of utter devotion exists. Just as a grown man would become protective of his girlfriend or wife, the young male feels compelled to protect and love his mother as if it is his duty and responsibility. As the child grows older, this mindset wears off but still exists in the subconscious. The Oedipus complex rears its head in all of the above texts. While Woody Allen’s works are entirely more cerebral and self-serving than most at the box office, bookstore or newsstand today, modern audiences are still presented with the idea of the sex-consumed male. As mentioned above, age is a master manipulator of the psyche and emotions. As entertainment and the culture industry thrives, we submerge ourselves into the escapist worlds of the characters created for the big screen and in the pages of novels. While women definitely exhibit more and more sexual freedom, for the purpose of this argument, males are dominantly portrayed and sexual minded creatures. The difference is, though, that grown men are often seen as sexually confused, plagued and consumed with the act resulting in being viewed as deviants, while teenage boys are seen as hormonal, normal and funny in their quest to get laid.
The semester began with the examination of Philip Roth’s Portnoy’s Complaint. Originally published in 1969, Portnoy’s Complaint was received as a scandalous, horrific depiction of a sexually obsessed young man. The audience engages with the main character, Alexander Portnoy. Portnoy is young, Jewish, neurotic yet self-loving (in more ways than one) and spilling his guts the entire length of the text to his therapist, Dr. Spielvogel. Alex’s “mommy issues” shine through very clear, paving the way for reflection of how people are portrayed in arts and entertainment.
Judd Apatow is undoubtedly one of the most successful director/producers on the planet right now. His works include Undeclared and Freaks and Geeks, both TV sitcoms exploring the emotionally and sexually frustrating lives of high school students. Apatow is more recently praised for his feature films, including Knocked Up, Superbad and Forgetting Sarah Marshall. His works are prime examples of the idea of sex as mechanism of young, male life. For example, the 2007 box-office hit Superbad follows two best friends, Seth and Evan. As graduating seniors, the boys embark on a mission to somehow score booze with their socially inept friend’s fake ID. The quest for alcohol does not exist in the hopes of a night of inebriation, but instead to garner the respect of Jules – Seth’s crush. Jules’ house is the ultimate destination – where the boys know they have sex as a reward for “bringing the party.” Shenanigans ensue throughout the film, all revolving around sexually charged jokes and references. The audience response was more than positive and is now considered to be a “classic.” In all honesty, if Apatow had asked the writers of Superbad to tweak their premise, possibly making Seth and Evan 35 year old men instead of 17 year old boys, it is highly likely that the audience response would find the flick to be less appealing. Why is that? For one reason – although almost everyone thinks about, wants and has sex, being a hormonal teenage boy hell-bent on getting some action while encountering unsavory characters and trying escape a drunken fist fight is much more acceptable than witnessing a 40+ year old man battle his “sex demons” such as in Choke – a novel by Chuck Palahniuk.
Youth has been stamped as a period of your existence where mistakes can be made and all dumb mistakes made are looked back on with endearment. It’s perfectly acceptable to be a pizza delivery driver at 17 years old, but not necessarily the most coveted position as an adult. When the plot of Choke unfolds, the scene is set for the main character named Victor Mancini. Mancini is a former medical student who now works as a colonial re-enactment park. He frequents sex addict meetings not to better his “addiction” but to take advantage of the women he meets. As a child, his mother provoked the law causing her custody to be turned over to the state. As Victor bounced from foster home to foster home, he found ways to be back with his mother who would announce her presence in places like drugstores (over the intercom, using a specially assigned code name.) Now approaching his thirties, Victor lives a menial existence of working a dead end job, having sex with anything that won’t walk away from him and tends to his mother – who is in a nursing home for the mentally unstable. Freud would suggest that the motivation for Palahniuk’s “Victor Mancini” comes from a place rooted in the Oedipus Complex. As a child, Victor adored his mother, only to have her ripped away. He rebelled as a youth and grown up, focusing his emotional distress into abundant sexual fetishism and “addiction” as a coping mechanism to fulfill his childhood desire of inherent sexual attraction to his mother.

Monday, February 15, 2010

Pollock Lived in the "Now"


Art in its truest form seeks to do one thing – express feelings, emotions and the in
otner workings of the human mind. Some of the most famous and “important” paintings are depictions of realistic life – natural landscapes, portraits and human life in general. While some artists depended on the world around them to create pieces, others went into the depths of their minds to be inspired.
Although a work like Gericault’s Raft of the Medusa roused emotion and helped bring light to a politically fueled cause, it is important to recognize the equal weightiness of abstract expressionist Jackson Pollock. Pollock rose to fame in the late 1940’s when his style of “drip painting” began to gain notoriety. In order to do this, Pollock would pour and drip layers of paint onto a canvas on the floor. This style was deemed “action painting.” According to the text by Rosenberg, this method brought Pollock out of the typical forum that artists belonged to. He was placed into the “arena” and not just tending to a space where reality could be reproduced.

When talking about the originality factor, Walter Benjamin states that even the “most perfect” piece of art that is reproduced can lack. Jackson Pollock’s work serves as an antidote to this because his work is so much in the present. He worked off of his present emotions and the depths of his mind. Although some of the most sought after paintings and works of art are beautiful and priceless in nature, abstract works like those that Pollock created are creatively untouchable. Peter Paul Rubens’ Samson and Delilah is a gorgeous representation of a biblical story, and remains one of the most visited paintings at London’s National Gallery. No serious comparison could be made with Rubens and Pollock though – they’re completely different animals.

It’s been said that Pollock was not famous for the end-result subject of his paintings, but the palpable energy and emotion that went into the creative process. To recreate this would be hard, if not impossible. Sure postcards, key chains and posters can be printed in Pollock’s style – but nothing compares to the original canvas, displaying emotions in their purest, dripping form.

Tuesday, February 9, 2010

Response Paper - I Love You, Man



If I’ve learned anything this semester thus far, it’s that there is a whole genre of movies and culture influenced by Woody Allen. Whether this influence is explicit or an unconscious reflection of the bumbling neurotic from Brooklyn, New York, movies today often contain elements made most popular by Allen. It’s said that one either hates Allen’s work, or loves it. There’s supposedly no middle ground. Having not been exposed to many of Allen’s plays, movies and/or essays, I remained neutral. While I haven’t yet decided which team I’m playing for, I have been able to make connections with films today.


Actual wit and cerebral humor has taken the backseat in movies today. Titles including the Jackass series, most of Judd Apatow’s films (which I absolutely love, for honesty’s sake) like The 40 Year Old Virgin, Knocked Up & Superbad are all departures from films like Annie Hall; Play it Again, Sam and Bananas. In the latter titles, the main character is usually some warped form of Woody Allen himself. The plot often revolves around one person or the other missing a session with his/her “analyst,” trying to keep a relationship from going to shambles, or even the actual quest to find a relationship. All in all, Allen’s movies are reflections of his own life – one could speculate that they are an outlet to vent his guilt/neurotic tendencies. For example, he is said to have suffered from an Oedipal Complex. This Freudian theory could be picked out of many of his movies, as he tries to fill the matriarchal void in his life through relationships and sex.

Despite the very apparent direction change in the film industry, one recently-released movie seemed to have multiple connections to Woody Allen and Sigmund Freud. Although I mentioned Judd Apatow as contribution to the demise of intellectual humor, his movie I Love You, Man strikes me as having Allen & Freudian influences. The plot revolves around Peter Klaven (Paul Rudd,) a newly engaged real estate agent with no male friends and little to no social skills. At one point in the film, Peter is asked who his best friend is. He replies, “I guess it was my mom.” It is important to mention at this time, as well, that Joyce Klaven (Jane Curtain) is also a real estate agent. Following in his mother’s footsteps, Peter surrounds himself with women in the office and becomes romantically involved and engaged with Zooey Rice (Rashida Jones) within less than a year. Freud would argue that this lack of male camaraderie and swift jump into marital bliss is a side effect of a serious oedipal complex. From the time a male baby is born, he sees his mother. Because he is unable to realize the relationship from infancy to adolescence (more or less) the child develops a strong connection (Freud would say sexual connection) to his mother, and a resentment toward his father. In I Love You, Man Peter experiences this. He adores his mother, and resents his father. Case in point – at dinner, Peter’s father Oswald (J.K. Simmons) tells him he has only ever had two best friends in his life. A former coworker named Hank, and Robby, Peter’s younger, homosexual brother. It is apparent that Peter feels slighted by this comment, however the the audience shown right away he wasn’t entirely overlooked as a child by his parents – the camera pans to a picture of Joyce and her son, Peter, leaping into the air (holding hands) next to a real estate sign boasting “Sold!”
In terms of connecting I Love You, Man with Woody Allen it would suffice to say that Peter’s character traits wholeheartedly resemble many of the characters Allen has created for himself. He displays the neurotic characteristics of a worrywart (Annie Hall’s Alvy Singer,) and the social incompetency of Allan in Play it Again, Sam. It isn’t until Sydney Fife (Jason Segel [swoon]) comes along to condition Peter into what it is to be an adult male – with friends!



Thursday, February 4, 2010

There's No "I" in Team


I've always been the type to handle stress somewhat decently. When I'm told I have to a presentation (solo or group) I freak out, though. I tend to procrastinate, and get pre-production anxiety (so-to-speak.) For lit + film I signed up for the very first group presentation, even though I had that nagging feeling of dread and despair.

The subject of our presentation was Portnoy's Complaint by Philip Roth. It was, to say the least, a very interesting book. I'm not a prude, but I have to say it was shocking to read the combination of every filthy word imaginable for a class.

The group I worked with was one of the more positive experiences I've had with group work. All of the girls were very willing to contribute and make sure the work was equal. Because of conflicting schedules of crazy work and school hours, we didn't have much face-to-face time. Instead, we spent the given class period working and devising our strategy. We also corresponded via e-mail and made sure any new ideas were run by each other.

My particular portion/contribution to the presentation was the analysis of themes between Roth's Portnoy's Complaint and Woody Allen's personal/professional life.

One issue we faced was the no-show in our group. From the beginning, we wondered who our sixth group member was. We asked around class and made an announcement, but #6 never connected with us. Low and behold, presentation day came and we heard, "Who's in group one? Who's in group one?" Not paying attention, most of us called out, "We are!" to which we heard, "Cool, cool. I'm good to go!"

Uh - what?

Apparently the no-show felt no excuse was neccesary, and didn't take into account all of our glaring faces. So, all six of us went to the front of the room to give our spiel...

The kicker was #6's very professional, prepared contribution to our presentation: sitting and TEXTING (while we all stood [even our group member with a severly sprained ankle.])

To finish off, we were treated to this gem...

#6: (after some very general commentary about the book) "Thank you all! We hope you enjoyed our presentation!"

ARE YOU SERIOUS?! We're in college, people!